![]() ![]() If more extensive modifications are required, the EPF must prepare a preliminary final EIS incorporating these modifications for coordination within the Air Force. 4(c)), to HQ USAF/A7CI for filing with the EPA (. However, the EPF must submit the Draft EIS and all of the above documents, with a new cover sheet indicating that it is a final EIS (. (a ) If changes in the draft EIS are minor or limited to factual corrections and responses to comments, the proponent and EPF may, with the prior approval of HQ USAF/A7CI and SAF/IEI, prepare a document containing only comments on the Draft EIS, Air Force responses, and errata sheets of changes staffed to the HQ USAF ESOHC for coordination. Public scoping meetings should generally be held at locations not on the installation. Scoping meeting plans are similar in content to public hearing plans (see appendix C). The EPF must send scripts for scoping meetings to HQ USAF/A7CI (or ANGRC/CEV) no later than 30 days before the first scoping meeting. ![]() The result of scoping is that the proponent and EPF determine the range of actions, alternatives, and impacts to be considered in the EIS (. Additionally, scoping allows early and more meaningful participation by the public. ![]() The purpose of this process is to de-emphasize insignificant issues and focus the scope of the environmental analysis on significant issues (. The scoping process must start prior to official public scoping meetings and continue through to preparation of the draft EIS. The scoping process is an iterative, pro-active process of communicating with individual citizens, neighborhood, community, and local leaders, public interest groups, congressional delegations, state, Tribal, and local governments, and federal agencies. Methods of scoping range from soliciting written comments to conducting public scoping meetings (see. 7) to determine the scope of issues to be addressed and to help identify significant environmental issues to be analyzed in depth. (a ) After publication of the NOI for an EIS, the EPF must initiate the public scoping process (. If the Air Force identifies a large number of reasonable alternatives, it may limit alternatives selected for detailed environmental analysis to a reasonable range or to a reasonable number of examples covering the full spectrum of alternatives. The Air Force need not analyze highly speculative alternatives, such as those requiring a major, unlikely change in law or governmental policy. The Air Force must also consider reasonable alternatives raised during the scoping process (see § 989.18) or suggested by others, as well as combinations of alternatives. They may involve another government agency or military service to assist in the project or even to become the lead agency. Reasonable alternatives are not limited to those directly within the power of the Air Force to implement. (b ) “Reasonable” alternatives are those that meet the underlying purpose and need for the proposed action and that would cause a reasonable person to inquire further before choosing a particular course of action. Procedures for Holding Public Hearings on Draft Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) Glossary of References, Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Terms Requests from Non-Air Force agencies or entities.ĪF Form 813, Request for Environmental Impact Analysis. Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |